(La Tercera) Chile is unlikely to count in the next decade with an array economically viable and sustainable energy without resorting to large hydroelectric and nuclear power. This is the conclusion reached by the leading industry consultants. electroconsultores partner of Francisco Aguirre explains that today has no authority to reject projects as spaces HidroAysén, because the big problem facing the country over the next 15 years and especially for the next decade is to see how you meet their energy demands . | explains that whereas growth of the economy on 3% to 4% in that period of time is required to incorporate some 15,000 MW of additional generation and now the only technology capable of meeting this demand given are hydroelectricity, coal and nuclear energy. says this is evident to see how the energy matrix is \u200b\u200bcomposed of the world, where coal accounts for 40%, hydroelectricity and the other 40% gas, in equal parts, and the rest is divided between the 16% nuclear energy and 4% of unconventional renewable. Aguirre adds that to meet energy growth, Chile needs "at least two and two thermal power projects HidroAysén Castile" and, them, 5,000 MW are yet to complete, and hence the importance of nuclear energy. | Vivianne Blanlot, former head of the CNE, agreed that given this situation, Chile is in a position to say no to other projects HidroAysén hydroelectric and nuclear power. Also considered relevant the liquefied natural gas. states that in the case of the latter energy and considering the nuclear crisis in Japan, the definitions that go into how to finally make this a safe option for the country and that this aspect should be investigated and studies continue feasible to achieve their incorporation into the energy matrix. | For her, the worst that can happen is that porJapón completely discarding is chosen, in circumstances where the problem is related to old plants that do not have cutting-edge technologies. Failure to hydropower, Sebastian Bernstein, former executive secretary of the National Energy Commission (CNE), said that the alternatives that are available to meet the need for energy supply in the next decade for improvement are the component thermocouple. | This could have negative effects on the carbon footprint of the country. " The executive said that in the current scenario and demand for energy needs of this decade the central and HidroAysén approval "is not critical," but points out that from the next decade would be more necessary. "After 2020, without any central in Aysen, the alternatives are many. Would be more power plants - and some NCRE, but not massively, possibly gas or coal, and hence the issue of whether to apply any penalties as a result of greenhouse gases, "he says. Matches | academic and consultant Huhg Rudnick, who estimated that "supplement" the lack of such sources coal is an option, although little is attractive because of its ultimate impact matrix fossilization. "If it wants to develop hydropower and nuclear, the only thing we would be coal. This is a road that is not attractive by itself, because our array is going to be doing more dirty, "he says, adding that this could mean building more than 12 power plants around 400 MW each to replace, placement problems with this cause. The offer comes after 2020 | Studies in Bachelet's government realized that the first nuclear power could be operational around 2025. For HidroAysén, according to the schedule, once approved by the liíea power transmission would be in full operation between 2019 and 2022. Source / La Tercera | | | Source: Spread this article freely SEE, THINK, WRITE. Greetings |
Rodrigo González Fernández
0 comments:
Post a Comment